Skip to content

Category Archives: Green Jobs

India and China sign climate change pact ahead of Copenhagen

India and China put aside a diplomatic spat to sign a five-year agreement Wednesday to cooperate on climate change leading up to crucial talks in Copenhagen.

The pact establishes a working group to exchange information on climate change ahead of a high-stakes summit in the Danish capital from Dec. 7-18 where nations will attempt to clinch a treaty to reduce carbon emissions.

“We regard India as a sincere, devoted friend and the MoU (memorandum of understanding) on climate change will take our cooperation on the issue to a new high,” Xie Zhenhua, vice chairman and minister of China’s National Development and Reforms Commission said at the signing in New Delhi.

India and China are among the world’s biggest polluters and both have so far taken a united stand on rejecting binding emissions cuts, arguing that carbon caps will hinder them in their quest to alleviate poverty.

“There is no difference between the Indian and Chinese position (on climate change),” said Indian Environment Minister Jairam Ramesh, adding that their stance “fully protects and promotes the interests of developing nations.”

The two nations traded jabs over a recent visit by Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh to Arunachal Pradesh, an Indian border state at the core of a long-standing territorial dispute between the neighbors.

On Tuesday, China said it was “firmly opposed” to a planned visit by Tibetan spiritual leader the Dalai Lama to the state, while India has recently complained about Chinese involvement in Pakistan-administered Kashmir.  (link)

Obama: Clean energy helps economy, environment

President Barack Obama says it’s time to do the right thing for the environment and at the same boost the economy by doing more to promote renewable energy and reduce the nation’s dependence on foreign oil.

At a town hall meeting Thursday in New Orleans, a participant asked Obama what can be done to make environmental policies more effective.

Obama pointed to clean-energy programs already being financed by the economic stimulus package. He said renewable energy has the potential to become a huge engine for economic growth in the economy.

The president said he’ll be pushing for a broader clean-energy initiative once he’s done working on health care legislation (link)

U.S. Stimulus Creates, Saves More Than 30,000 jobs, Federal Contractors Report

At least 30,383 jobs have been created directly or saved by contractors receiving money from the U.S. government’s stimulus program, according to news reports.

The figures released today are the first hard data to emerge that illustrates the effect of the stimulus, and they represent just a fraction of the $787 billion stimulus package. The jobs derive from the roughly $16 billion that federal government agencies awarded directly to contractors for infrastructure and social programs, of which just $2 billion had been spent by the beginning of October.

The jobs tally takes into account almost all the 5,232 federal contract recipient reports that have been filed, according to information summarized by the Recovery Accountability and Transparency Board. “Obviously incorrect submissions” from two contract recipient reports are being addressed, and posted figures will be amended, according to Recovery.gov, the government’s website on Recovery Act spending.

Jobs information from businesses and organizations receiving stimulus-funded grants or contracts from states is expected later this month.

According to the Wall Street Journal, federal contractors in Colorado reported that 4,695 jobs were created or saved — the most of any state — as a result of $550 million in stimulus awards, of which 48 million had been spent. In Michigan, the state with the highest unemployment, contractors reported 397 jobs were created or saved.

The Obama Administration has a goal of creating or saving 3.5 million jobs. In view of that target, Jared Bernstein, the chief economist for Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr., who is in charge of overseeing the stimulus, said in a prepared statement that it is “too soon to draw any global conclusions from this partial and preliminary data,” the New York Times noted.

The jobs tally comes just a day after the release of a report by Clean Edge Inc., whose study with online compensation data firm PayScale explores five major trends cleantech job trends — as well as pay ranges and green job hotspots.

Compensation for cleantech jobs is often competitive and the opportunities are not confined to metro areas, according to the report “Clean Tech Job Trends 2009” (PDF). The report is the first of what is to become an annual study on cleantech jobs, Clean Edge said.

The findings support earlier research about green jobs pay, availability and strategies for job creation. “For clean-tech jobs to matter, they need to pay well and provide job security — part of long-term and sustainable cleantech careers,” the study said.

The report lists a range of median pay for various cleantech jobs, which it described as:

“those that are a direct result of the development, production, and/or deployment of technologies that harness renewable materials and energy sources; reduce the use of natural resources by using them more efficiently and productively; and cut or eliminate pollution and toxic wastes. There’s no mistaking the types of jobs we’re talking about — they include solar photovoltaic (PV) system installers, wind-turbine technicians, energy-efficiency software developers, green building designers, and clean-energy marketers. While some of these jobs may seem exotic, they are increasingly becoming the norm.”

The median pay listed in the study spans from $36,100 a year ($17.36 an hour) for an insulation worker in green building construction to $106,000 a year for a renewable energy project developer.

In contrast, a study entitled “Yellow Light on Green Jobs” released by a U.S. Senate subcommittee this past spring held that green jobs advocates have exaggerated the promise of such opportunities. The report contends that proposals for green jobs would eliminate millions of traditional positions, wouldn’t be as plentiful as forecast and would pay poorly. The report said pay for a recycling processing job could be as low as $8.25 an hour and wages for a job at a renewable energy manufacturing facility could be as little as $11 an hour — compared to traditional manufacturing jobs paying $18 an hour.

The Clean Edge study points out, however, that the reeling economy has battered industrial America, traditional manufacturing and employment across the board.

“We stand at a unique crossroads,” the study says. “The recent global financial crisis has been disastrous for already struggling old-line industries in the U.S. … As has been quoted often, ‘A crisis is a terrible thing to waste.’ We believe this crisis can accelerate the transition to a clean-energy economy, with the creation of millions of new jobs in a wide range of cleantech sectors.”  (link)

New Clean Edge Report Reveals Major Trends In Global Clean-Tech Job Development And Growth

As the ‘green jobs’ trend evolves from political platform to economic reality, the industry driving it - clean tech - is becoming one of the country’s key markets for growth and job creation. In its first look at the state of clean-tech jobs in the U.S. and globally, Clean Edge, Inc., a leading clean-tech research and publishing firm, today releases Clean Tech Job Trends 2009. The report provides an insightful and compelling investigation of how these jobs are changing the face of industry, where the hotbeds of growth exist, and whether current clean-tech salaries are living up to their ‘green-over blue-collar’ promise. The free report can be downloaded at www.cleanedge.com.

In the report, job seekers, employers, investors, and policymakers have access to data including: clean-tech hot spots and leading companies in the U.S. and around the globe; the top five clean-tech job sectors; a study of median clean-tech compensation levels; five trends reshaping clean tech; and emerging models for financing clean-tech growth.

According to Clean Edge research, the top 15 metro areas in the U.S. for clean-tech job activity, based on an analysis of job postings, investment and patent activity, and other data, include the San Francisco Bay Area at #1, Greater Boston/southern New Hampshire at #4; Denver/northern Colorado at #6; Austin-San Marcos, Texas at #12; and Detroit-Ann Arbor, Michigan at #14. (Complete results available in free downloadable report).

“Unlike the early days of computers and IT, the clean-tech economy is a highly dispersed phenomenon, with no single place, industry, or professional demographic controlling the sector,” said Ron Pernick, co-founder and managing director of Clean Edge and co-author, The Clean Tech Revolution. “This is apparent in the formerly shuttered manufacturing facilities, often in hard-hit industrial areas, that are now opening their doors to make products like wind turbines and electric vehicle batteries. Similarly, clean-tech deployment and growth has become an economic cornerstone for nations looking to innovate and compete in the 21st century – from the likely suspects of Japan, Germany, and the U.S. to emerging powerhouses such as China, South Korea, and even oil-rich Abu Dhabi.”

To bring clarity to this rapidly transforming employment landscape, the study reveals five major trends reshaping clean-tech jobs:

– Energy Efficiency - The Most Bang For Your Buck
– Aging Workforce, New Clean Technologies Transform Utility Industry Landscape
– Coming to a Campus Near You: Clean-Tech Career Training
– Clean-Tech Manufacturing Moves Near End-Use Markets
– The Next Big Thing in IT Jobs: Networking the Grid

Clean Tech Job Trends 2009 also provides the first comprehensive look into clean-tech compensation. The report overviews a range of positions and their median pay levels worldwide, from mid-level LEED-certified architect ($58,700) and smart grid hardware design engineer ($87,700) to entry-level wind turbine technician ($52,600) and solar energy system installer ($40,000). The survey is a coproduction of Clean Edge and PayScale (www.payscale.com), the leading online provider of employee compensation data. Founded in 2002, PayScale maintains the world’s largest database of individual compensation profiles and provides an immediate and precise snapshot of current market salaries to employees and employers. For those interested in taking the ongoing job survey or purchasing more detailed clean-tech compensation reports, visit www.cleanedge.com/payscale.

In addition to the Clean-Tech Job Trends report, Clean Edge is also releasing a companion report entitled Five Emerging U.S. Finance Models: Powering Clean-Tech Economic Growth and Job Creation. Published in partnership with Green America (www.greenamericatoday.org), a leading green-economy organization, this report articulates that government spending alone does not drive clean-tech markets. In order for the U.S. to remain competitive with countries such as China and those in the European Union, innovative finance vehicles are imperative. The report examines new mechanisms such as Clean Energy Victory Bonds, the Green Bank, City Funds, Federal Loan Guarantees, and Tax Credit Bonds. The report can be downloaded at www.cleanedge.com and www.greenamericatoday.org.

“Clean-energy jobs are already growing faster than other sectors, but it is forecasted that we are just at the beginning of the clean-tech job creation era,” says Clean Edge contributing editor Clint Wilder. “This is the greatest opportunity for wealth, job creation, and global economic competitiveness in a generation — but we need vision, intelligence, and resources to guide our course in expanding this sector.”   (link)

Job Seekers: TSMC Pushing Hard to Fill Spots for Solar, Lights

Get those resumes moving. TSMC is looking for execs to head up its push for solar. Other conglomerates may follow.

Employment continues to be difficult, but qualified engineers might want to remember these four letters: TSMC.

Recruiters are actively seeking managers with eight to ten years experience to fill executive positions in Taiwan for Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., according to sources.  Compensation is within “international standard semiconductor industry package.” In particular, TSMC wants people with experience with solid state lighting, CIGS, and balance-of-systems in solar.

For the past few weeks, we’ve written a number of stories on how the chip giant, which created the “foundry” or factory-for-hire model in semicondutors, wants to move into energy. This summer, founder Morris Chang returned as CEO and the company said it would budget around $50 million for “possible solar investments.” TSMC also said it wanted to make LEDs, which are chips, TSMC’s speciality.

Additionally, sources in Silicon Valley told us that TSMC was talking to various VC firms about portfolio companies that might fit the company’s needs. The recruiting push is the next step.

So what’s the takeaway?

1. If you want a new job, contact them. The company is one of the most successful in the history of the chip industry. It has also in the past hired away academics from universities like UC Berkeley to improve its processes.

2. It is the first time we’ve heard CIGS in conjunction with TSMC. Does TSMC plan to make CIGS solar cells or serve as a foundry for people who have CIGS designs but lack a factory? It could go either way. Many are expecting to see a foundry come to the solar business and TSMC is the logical company to do it first. Although some of the early CIGS companies had to spend tens of millions to build prototype facilities, some new entrants like NuvoSun and Telio Solar have managed to get sample chips out the door by spending only a few million. These new smaller companies don’t have the money to build factories. A foundry thus could become a lifeline for them to get to market (see Will the Solar Industry Become Like the PC Industry?). Then again, if it can perfect at CIGS manufacturing process, it could just make CIGS cells itself.

3. This could mark the beginning of a revitalization of Asian conglomerates. Toshiba has mentioned it might buy LED companies. Samsung wants to make a push into energy efficiency. Panasonic will soon begin selling solar panels through its acquisition of Sanyo, make batteries to Tesla Motors, and it sits on many of the boards for smart grid standards. Japan has a long history in developing solar and energy efficiency technologies.

This could be like the 1980s again.  (link)

Green Jobs – Green New York Act means new jobs for clean energy economy

Governor David A. Paterson today signed the Green Jobs/Green New York Act, establishing a program that will create green jobs and stimulate investment in weatherization and energy efficiency improvements for residential and commercial buildings.

Governor Paterson held the signing ceremony at the New York State Weatherization Directors Association training center in North Syracuse, where New Yorkers are being trained to weatherize and retrofit homes.

“The workforce training that this bill supports will prepare New Yorkers to find jobs in the 21st century clean energy economy that we are building here in New York. I am proud to sign into law the Green Jobs/Green New York Act, so we can help New Yorkers secure jobs that help working families and businesses cut their energy bills while reducing greenhouse gas pollution,” said Governor Paterson. “I have laid out a New Economy jobs plan that will help to put New Yorkers back to work through innovation and technology, and have set a goal to meet 45 percent of our electricity needs through energy efficiency and renewables by 2015. The Green Jobs/Green New York Act is an important tool in achieving these energy and economic goals.”

Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver said: “Thanks to the Green Jobs/Green New York legislation, homeowners, small business owners, and not-for-profit agencies are encouraged to undertake the energy efficiency projects that will reduce utility bills as well as greenhouse gas emissions. As homes and facilities are retrofitted, and green jobs are created, this program will become a much-need boost for struggling local economies throughout New York State.”

Senator Darrel J. Aubertine, Chair of the Senate Energy and Telecommunications Committee, said: “I want to thank the Governor for signing this important legislation here today. This truly is a win-win for New York State which will enable homeowners and small businesses to save money on their energy bills all while creating jobs and putting thousands of New Yorkers back to work. This legislation directs these loans to be spread across the state based on need and here in Upstate New York, where keeping the heat in is a top priority each winter, this program will create jobs and save consumers on their monthly energy bills.”

Governor Paterson also announced that $7 million from the State Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance (OTDA) has been awarded to 11 counties and New York City to launch the new Green Jobs Corps programs. This funding will allow local departments of social services to provide job skills training and subsidized employment opportunities in “green industries” for public assistance recipients and low-income individuals. Participants in the Green Jobs Corps program will develop occupational skills that will enable them to get jobs in addition to supporting their ability to remain employed and advance in their careers.

To help connect job seekers with the opportunities being announced today, Governor Paterson also announced the launch of a new web site to assist those seeking to enter the new green job sector. The site – www.greencareersny.com – is designed to make it easy for individuals, businesses and workforce professionals to find the State’s local training programs and green job opportunities.

The Green Jobs/Green New York Act (A.8901/S.5888 and chapter amendment A.9031/S.6032) directs the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA) to establish revolving loan and green jobs training programs to retrofit homes to conserve energy. Loans will be capped at $13,000 for residential and $26,000 for commercial properties. The program will target middleclass homeowners and small businesses that will pay back the loan out of what they save on their energy bills. The job training component will focus on new entrants to the workforce and displaced workers. The training programs and any education and enrollment efforts will be subjected to a competitive procurement process available to community based-organizations.

To fund the weatherization loan program and establish the statewide green jobs training program, NYSERDA will use a portion of $112 million from the auction of carbon emission credits through the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI). The seed money from the RGGI fund will be used to leverage private investment, which will move us toward a goal of retrofitting one million homes over the next five years.

The Green Jobs bill will allow the State to increase its existing and successful weatherization efforts that are already underway. The Weatherization Assistance Program (WAP) will eventually administer $394 million in funds under American Recover and Reinvestment Act (ARRA). By the end of this month, $190 million in 64 contracts, representing every county in New York, will be executed as part of the WAP program. Under WAP, a minimum of 45,000 residential units will be weatherized in New York State.

Senator David Valesky said: “The Green Jobs/Green NY program will help Upstate tremendously by reducing energy costs for homeowners and creating thousands of permanent, well-paying jobs. This is the kind of creative thinking we need – combining job creation with environmentally friendly initiatives – that will help jump start the Upstate New York economy. I am pleased the Governor recognized the importance of this program by signing it into law.”

Assemblyman Kevin Cahill, Chair of the Assembly Energy Committee, said: “The goal of the Green Jobs/Green New York Program is three fold. It is designed to create jobs, lower energy costs for households, not-for-profits and small businesses and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. This is exactly the type of innovative initiative President Obama envisions when he talks about creating green jobs and the new clean energy economy. A successful program here in New York will establish us as a national leader in tackling the tough challenges of climate change and employment opportunities in the 21st Century. I am proud to have worked with Speaker Silver and Assemblyman Sweeney to sponsor this important legislation. I thank Governor Paterson and Senator Aubertine for their leadership in guiding this package through the Senate and into law.”  (link)

U.K.: Energy efficient homes and more nuclear power: Conservatives unveil ‘green deal’

Tories court property owners with promise of free cost-saving home improvement scheme and pledge ‘immediate action to to keep Britain’s lights on’

Every UK homeowners will benefit from an allowance of up to £6,500 to make their properties more energy efficient, under a “green deal” proposed by the Conservatives today. The idea is part of a wider energy and climate change package aimed at kick-starting a green economy in the UK. 

The shadow energy and climate change secretary, Greg Clark, said a Tory government would immediately approve construction of several nuclear and coal-fired power stations to help prevent electricity blackouts in the next decade, to strengthen the national grid and enable the harnessing of renewable energy sources at sea, and to boost the number of charging points for electric cars. 

Heating and powering homes accounts for 27% of the UK’s overall carbon emissions and, speaking this afternoon, Clark set out how the green deal would aim to reduce this total. The money, to be sourced from the private sector, would not be given to householders directly; instead, energy companies or charities would insulate homes at no cost to residents and then recoup the money through energy bills. As the new insulation would reduce energy use, this should not result in extra costs for the homeowner. 

In his speech, Clark said a Conservative government would “begin with a bound and with immediate action to keep Britain’s lights on, to cut greenhouse gas emissions and give Britain leadership in a low-carbon world.”He criticised Labour’s inability to appoint a longstanding energy minister. “[In] 12 years […] there have been no less than 15 energy ministers,” he said. “They had an average of nine months each. Enough to make a baby. But, apparently, not to make a decision.”

Tory proposals include:

• approving 5GW’s worth of coal-fired power stations, fitted with carbon capture and storage technology which has the potential to trap up to 90% of carbon emissions

• securing planning permission for nuclear power stations by 2017

• upgrading the national electricity grid to allow it to respond intelligently to the peaks and troughs of demand throughout a day

• extending the national grid out to sea to enable the development of offshore wind, wave and tidal energy. 

John Sauven, executive director of Greenpeace UK, said that no political party had been able to deal with the challenge of coal. “We need a step change in political thinking to get the UK on a genuinely low carbon path and to achieve the zero emission power sector required by the Committee on Climate Change by 2030.” 

He added: “The current government position is to capture only a small proportion of climate changing emissions from new coal plants. That’s not going to be good enough. To get it right, the Conservatives need to be clear that they will set a tough emissions standard that rules out all emissions [from coal plants] from day one, and [that they will] commit to meeting Britain’s ambitious renewable energy target.” 

For individuals, the Tories’ green deal will mean that an average household can expect savings of £360 per year on energy bills via simple home adjustments, including energy-efficient lighting and cavity and loft insulation. Based on an average spend of around £1500 per home, around £120 of the yearly saving, for 25 years, would go towards repayment of the loan and interest. Householders would be able to keep the remaining £240, with the loan tied to the property rather than the homeowner who initially took it out. 

The Conservatives said that a scheme for retrofitting homes could see the creation of a £2.5bn per year industry and up to 70,000 skilled jobs, including 3,500 apprenticeships. 

Paul King, chief executive of the UK Green Building Council said the building and home improvement industry needed political leadership to “unlock a fantastic new market for refurbishment, with huge benefits for people, the economy and the environment. The upfront capital cost has been an understandably big barrier for most people, but this type of scheme allows householders to pay for the work from the savings they make on their energy bill – and still be better off as a result. The green deal is a big step in the right direction.” 

But the energy and climate change secretary, Ed Miliband, said: “The Tories fail to deliver on renewables, since Tory councils turn down 60% of windfarm applications; they can’t tackle climate change through Europe because they hang around with climate change deniers; and they vote against the investment in the green manufacturing jobs of the future. Voters should beware: the Tories may talk green but they act blue.”  

Ed Matthews, a campaigner at Friends of the Earth, thought the figure of £6,500 was too low. “The level of funding must be at least, on average, £20,000 per home to enable homes to cut at least half their carbon emissions.” 

The Department for Energy and Climate Change announced plans earlier this year to provide green makeovers, to include cavity wall and loft insulation, for 40,000 homes a year by 2015. Financial incentives for householders will also be available for low-carbon technologies such as solar panels, biomass boilers and ground source heat pumps, paid for by a levy on utility companies. The government wants 7m homes to benefit from the schemes by 2020, extending to all UK households by 2030. If successful, the strategy would shave a third off household carbon emissions by 2020.  (link)

Green energy on a roll but experts warn of bubbles

Investors betting on renewable or clean energy and related green themes are looking for healthy and sustainable returns, but the road is full of pitfalls for the unwary, investment managers warned on Thursday.

Attendees at the Jetfin Green 2009 alternative investment conference in Geneva heard that some alternative energy sources are now in a position to compete with more established sources, even in the absence of government subsidies.

 

“Renewable energy technologies are at a point where they are cost competitive with the grid, Copenhagen aside,” said Walther Lovato, a portfolio manager at California-based asset manager Passport Capital.

 

He was referring to a summit to be held in Copenhagen in December, when world leaders will attempt to agree a new global climate treaty to replace the Kyoto Protocol that expires in 2012, potentially leading to more subsidies for green energy.

 

At present government expenditure and subsidies are already a significant driver of the alternative energy industry.

 

“Some $500 billion has been focused on alternative energy… with a growing emphasis on energy efficiency,” said Sandy Christie of BlackRock Investment Management, UK.

 

The focus on efficiency was not always there. As recently as 2008 the U.S. Congress voted to continue levying tariffs on imported ethanol and subsidizing domestic ethanol production from corn, in spite of data showing that production was more expensive and the fuel less efficient than sugar-based ethanol.

 

But ever since it became clear that subsidies could not create a profitable business, U.S. producers such as Pacific Ethanol have been shunned by investors.

 

Indeed most investors said they now avoid companies which rely on government support and warned that investors can get burned when subsidies distort views of a company’s viability.

 

For example, solar industry experts blamed Spanish subsidies of photovoltaic cells for pushing up prices. The solar industry increased production to meet demand, but when the subsidies were withdrawn, demand for the cells fell and prices collapsed.

 

With prices continuing to weaken, shares at even large and profitable solar companies such as Suntech Power and First Solar have underperformed the broader market.

 

SOME FROTH

 

Fund managers warned that bubbles tended to develop when investment themes begin to gather speed, and green investing was no exception.

 

“We saw an ethanol bubble and a biofuels bubble a few years ago and we’ve just seen a solar bubble,” said Roland Pfeuti, head of private equity at SAM, owned by Dutch asset manager Robeco.

 

Fund managers said these bubbles were fueled by “hot” money, when speculative investors piled into popular investment themes in the hope of making a quick profits, but sell out quickly when these fail to materialize.

 

Even so, the financial crisis has killed off many of the weaker companies, with only the financially viable and those able to raise cash in challenging market conditions surviving, and many are now poised for profitability, said one conference attendee.

 

Christie was one of many managers who favored wind energy, which he described as “cost competitive and scaleable,” and solar energy where module production costs and prices had come down to viable levels.

 

Fund of funds managers and other end investors said they had increased or intended to increase their allocations to financially viable green themes, which were no longer a marginal asset class.

 

“The trend toward green investing is completely irreversible,” said Tim Mockett, managing director of the property team at UK-based Climate Change Capital.

 

“We call it the new mainstream.”  (link)

New climate coalition launches

Unions, environmentalists, hunters, farmers, veterans, and religious groups launched a major new campaign on Tuesday to push for congressional action on global warming this year.

 

The powerful coalition forms as prospects for passing a climate bill have dimmed. The contentious health care debate is expected to take center stage in the Senate through the fall. And the Obama administration has signaled that passing health care reform should take precedence over a climate and energy bill.

 

Democratic Sens. John Kerry and Barbara Boxer delayed the introduction of their long-awaited climate change bill last month, citing Sen. Ted Kennedy’s death and Kerry’s recovery from hip surgery.

 

The coalition, called Clean Energy Works, hopes to muscle a climate and energy bill through Congress, despite skepticism from coal and manufacturing state Democrats.

 

The new coalition plans to target 28 midwestern, western and southern states with hundreds of field workers, a lobbying campaign, and television, radio, and Internet advertising. More than sixty organizations have joined the group, including the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, the League of Rural Voters, and Service Employees International Union.

 

The coalition is headed up by veteran political strategist Paul Tewes, known for his work in national political organizing. Tewes is credited with President Barack Obama’s surprise win in Iowa, where he worked as state director for the Obama campaign.

 

The advertising buys, says a spokesman, will be “very significant.”

 

The group argues that climate legislation would not only slow global warming but help reduce America’s dependence on foreign oil, improve national security, and create new jobs in renewable fuels and other types of emerging green industries.

 

“Millions of Americans want more clean energy jobs, less pollution, and greater national security,” said David Di Martino, Clean Energy Works Communications Director. “We send a billion dollars a day overseas to pay for our oil. It’s time to invest that money here – in secure, renewable energy sources that are made in America, provide jobs for Americans and work for America.”

 

Many of the organizations in the group joined forces earlier this year to push for the House climate and energy bill. The legislation passed the House with a slim majority of Democrats in late June. (link)

Arianna Huffington: Thank You, Glenn Beck!

Thank you, Glenn Beck. By helping force the resignation of Van Jones, you have done a great service to your country. But in the exact opposite way than what you intended.

Your vile and vicious smear campaign has helped reverse one of the worst examples of miscasting since John Wayne took on the role of Genghis Khan in The Conqueror.

Don’t get me wrong: Van Jones was the best person for the job he just gave up. But the job was not the best use of Van Jones.

Contrary to the media caricature, the real Van Jones is a thoughtful leader who knows how to use words to move people to action. To stick him behind a desk, working out the details of tax credits for green jobs — incredibly important though the job is — was never the best use of his unique and abundant skills.

This is not an attempt to put a positive spin on an ugly episode. I’ve actually been feeling this way ever since Van told me he was taking this job.

I remember going to the White House this spring for a briefing of journalists by David Axelrod. Before the meeting, Van and I met for a quick coffee and I was hit with the same overwhelming thought: how much we were going to miss his voice on the outside.

Now, thanks to Glenn Beck, we’ve got that voice back. No longer tied to his desk with a sock in his mouth, Van is now freed to do what he does best: inspire and energize groups around the country. Student groups and labor groups and small business groups and middle class Americans everywhere who are losing jobs and losing homes and losing hope. He’s free to push with all his might and insight for the vision tens of millions of Americans tirelessly worked for during the presidential campaign — the vision they voted for in November — but which is now in danger of being drowned in the fetid political swamps of Washington.

If Glenn Beck had any sense at all, he would have done everything in his power to keep Van Jones right where he was.

But he didn’t. And for this we should all be grateful.

Full disclosure: Van and I have been good friends for many years. We’ve worked together on a number of projects, I’ve written about his efforts to fight abuses in the criminal justice system, he’s blogged on HuffPost since soon after we launched, and I’ve watched him hold an audience spellbound at a wide range of events — from progressive gatherings to the World Economic Forum.

And I’ve never failed to be impressed by Van. He is a remarkable man. One of the things I’ve always found so impressive about him — and something completely lost in the partisan mudslinging — is his ability to build coalitions and create unlikely alliances. In pursuit of a clean energy future for America, Van has successfully brought together urban youth with clean-tech entrepreneurs, labor leaders with business leaders, civil rights activists with environmentalists. His skill in this area is exceptional, and much needed in America today.

Yes, he might believe that the foundation of the GOP’s legislative prowess can be found below the belt and to the rear, but that never stopped him from looking for ways to reach out and bridge the political, economic, racial, and social chasms that continue to divide us.

Back in 2002, I wrote about how the staid and anything-but-radical heads of the World Economic Forum had invited him to their conference and honored him as a “Global Leader for Tomorrow.” Jones had been protesting the World Trade Organization in Seattle and the International Monetary Fund in Washington. But that didn’t keep him from exchanging ideas with the rich and powerful at the Forum, or from keeping an open mind.

“The people I’ve met here,” Van told me at the time, “are much more thoughtful, complex, and concerned about social issues than either the left or the media portray them to be.”

That’s a sound bite you’re not likely to see being endlessly replayed on Fox News. But that’s the real Van Jones, not the caricature the Fox echo chamber has been pummeling for the last few weeks.

The real Van Jones has been lauded by the likes of Meg Whitman (she was very much for him before she decided she needed to be against him) and the editors of Time who named him one of the 100 most influential people in the world and one of the nation’s “Heroes of the Environment.” Or Fast Company magazine, which placed him on its list of the “12 Most Creative Minds.”

The real Van Jones is the speaker who told a crowd at last month’s National Clean Energy Summit in Las Vegas: “We’re asking questions progressives like but we’re giving answers that conservatives should like” (another sound bite you won’t see looped to death on Fox). He went on to stress the importance of enterprise, innovation and entrepreneurship in solving our economic and environmental problems.

More full disclosure: I despise 9/11 “truther” conspiracies. Indeed, one of the guidelines for bloggers on HuffPost is a ban on posts putting forth those kinds of theories. And it was stupid of Van to put his name on a very stupid “9/11 Truth Statement.” I’ve spoken to Van. He doesn’t believe that the Bush administration orchestrated the 9/11 attacks or allowed the attacks to happen in a cold-hearted attempt to gin up support. The 9/11 “Truthers” are fringe-dwellers and Van was completely wrong to allow himself to be associated with them.

But that mistake should not define him. Indeed this episode, besides putting Van back in the right role, will provoke a conversation about how people’s past should impact what they are able to do in the present.

If the sliming of Van Jones is an indication of how things are going to be, a lot of 20-somethings posting to their Facebook pages as we speak better start worrying about the digital crumbs they are leaving behind for the future Glenn Becks of the world.

Isn’t it time we acknowledge that no human being with any passion and deeply held beliefs ever emerged flawless into the world? And that if every mistake, misstep, boneheaded decision, or error in judgment becomes an automatic disqualifier for public service, then we’re going to be left with a political landscape filled with nothing but wrinkle-free, foible-free, passionless automatons who have never made a mistake because they never took the risk of having an original thought.

Van Jones is not foible-free. He’s human. And ardent in his desire to effect change. In fact, his journey from radical activist to someone who came to see that the solutions we need in this country are ones not easily categorized as right or left is what has made him such an effective leader. If we continue to obsessively see things through that right/left prism — and use those differences as weapons with which we attack our perceived enemies — it is going to be infinitely harder to move the country to where it needs to be.

Glenn Beck has taken Van out of his in-the-shadows position and thrust him into the spotlight. I told Van after his resignation that I hope he will take the extra attention and energy Beck created for him and, like a jujitsu black belt, turn the blow into an opening, an opportunity to transform the negative attack into something positive for himself and for the country. (link)